Comments on: sql vs. sql http://wonkabar.org/2006/08/29/sql-vs-sql/ cornflakes, cartoons, dragons, linux, multimedia, psychology, teenagers Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:05:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Jeff Smith http://wonkabar.org/2006/08/29/sql-vs-sql/#comment-119 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:09:13 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/?p=161#comment-119 I didn’t mean to stir the postgres/mysql when I posted that message. Sometimes I forgot people treat OSes, databases, browsers, etc like religions. It did prompt me to re-evaluate my DB schema and I have notice a great improvemnet. THANKS!!!

]]> By: Chris White http://wonkabar.org/2006/08/29/sql-vs-sql/#comment-118 Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:29:18 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/?p=161#comment-118 Well, see that’s the thing.

“use views, stored procedures, indexes, transactions and well-written queries”

Most of the people annoyed at MySQL are annoyed at it because working stored procedures and triggers came so late in the game. Arguments are generally set about why a database does not have standard SQL features.

]]> By: Scott Morris http://wonkabar.org/2006/08/29/sql-vs-sql/#comment-117 Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:33:51 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/?p=161#comment-117 Dude, I believe you. Well, I’ve seen it, too. Imagine that: do things right and they work better. What really sucks is that M$ can get away with hugely bloated resource hog software which *APPEARS* to be just as efficient. But, as you know from first-hand experience, if you just learn about some basic optimization techniques, that’s really the way to go.

]]>