<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ivtv modules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkabar.org/2007/08/27/ivtv-modules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkabar.org/2007/08/27/ivtv-modules/</link>
	<description>linux, databases, cartoons and cornflakes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://wonkabar.org/2007/08/27/ivtv-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-20693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkabar.org/archives/324#comment-20693</guid>
		<description>It seems xf86-video-ivtvdev is incompatible with ivtv 1.0.2. I believe they have a set of patches that should fix this.

I also seem to be having issues with ivtv-fb oopsing as its not built with the correct headers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems xf86-video-ivtvdev is incompatible with ivtv 1.0.2. I believe they have a set of patches that should fix this.</p>
<p>I also seem to be having issues with ivtv-fb oopsing as its not built with the correct headers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://wonkabar.org/2007/08/27/ivtv-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-20683</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkabar.org/archives/324#comment-20683</guid>
		<description>Yah, 1.0 is stable now on x86 and amd64.

It always seemed to me like there wasn&#039;t much need for docs, since it&#039;s pretty straight forward (emerge the package, follow the instructions) but I guess it wouldn&#039;t hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, 1.0 is stable now on x86 and amd64.</p>
<p>It always seemed to me like there wasn't much need for docs, since it's pretty straight forward (emerge the package, follow the instructions) but I guess it wouldn't hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wim</title>
		<link>http://wonkabar.org/2007/08/27/ivtv-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-20677</link>
		<dc:creator>Wim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkabar.org/archives/324#comment-20677</guid>
		<description>Does this mean 1.0.x is no longer masked or how should I see this? Getting ivtv to work is a real pain finding documentation is hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean 1.0.x is no longer masked or how should I see this? Getting ivtv to work is a real pain finding documentation is hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
