Comments on: preparing for dts http://wonkabar.org/2007/12/14/preparing-for-dts/ cornflakes, cartoons, dragons, linux, multimedia, psychology, teenagers Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:25:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: PoeticIntensity http://wonkabar.org/2007/12/14/preparing-for-dts/#comment-379 Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:27:29 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/archives/376#comment-379 It once was explained to me by a movie / audio buff as well – and from what I remember, it is exactly as Pariah explained it. I concur wholeheartedly.

In movie theaters, DTS is the bomb. On DVDs, the difference, in my opinion, can only be discerned by the absolute most discriminating audiophiles while listening to a movie DVD on a system employing the absolute best hardware.

In other words, DD is all but synonymous to DTS in DVD-land.

]]> By: Pariah http://wonkabar.org/2007/12/14/preparing-for-dts/#comment-378 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:17:14 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/archives/376#comment-378 Well, if I understand the different formats correctly, here’s the deal:
* Dolby (in theatres) is limted to around 380 kbps, due to the way the dolby signal is stored (between the sprockets)
* DTS (in theatres) just has a time-sync code on the film; the actual audio is on CD-ROM, and has a much higher bitrate (in the thousands).

On DVD, however, things are different:
* Dolby isn’t as limited by storing the sound data on the film. Dolby on a DVD is at a higher bitrate than in theatres.
* DTS, on the other hand, is limited by DVD, and has a lower bitrate than in theatres.

Hence the difference between Dolby & DTS are smaller on DVD than in a theatre; it’s not surprising you can’t hear the difference.

Space is also important on a DVD: Dolby is required. DTS is optional. both take up space. So do you want to put on a redundant sound track, or ‘extra’ bonus material? Or do you want to shoot for a single-layer disc and save some production costs?

]]>