Comments on: transcode and dvd::rip http://wonkabar.org/archives/270 linux, databases, cartoons and cornflakes Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:33:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Francesco Romani http://wonkabar.org/archives/270#comment-10304 Francesco Romani Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:07:25 +0000 http://wonkabar.org/archives/270#comment-10304 Hi Steve, and thanks for reporting news about transcode so regulary :) I've started myself using transcode in old good 0.6.x times because it seemed more logical and striaghtforward compared to mencoder. Unfortunately, now transcode was left behind a bit on feature set. A few words about my favorite topic, 1.1.0 (currently in CVS HEAD). Next release is near, but not so near unfortunately since I've finalized new architecture for multiple inputs, but coding and then testing is still missing :( I'd also like to encourage *every* regular transcode user to give a spin to 1.1.0. It is supposed to be *more stable* and usable than 1.0.x. We (transcode devs) always use last CVS HEAD for our everyday usage, not 1.0.x. Hi Steve,
and thanks for reporting news about transcode so regulary :)
I’ve started myself using transcode in old good 0.6.x times because it seemed more logical and striaghtforward compared to mencoder. Unfortunately, now transcode was left behind a bit on feature set.

A few words about my favorite topic, 1.1.0 (currently in CVS HEAD). Next release is near, but not so near unfortunately since I’ve finalized new architecture for multiple inputs, but coding and then testing is still missing :(

I’d also like to encourage *every* regular transcode user to give a spin to 1.1.0. It is supposed to be *more stable* and usable than 1.0.x. We (transcode devs) always use last CVS HEAD for our everyday usage, not 1.0.x.

]]>