<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the physics of superman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkabar.org/archives/69/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkabar.org/archives/69</link>
	<description>linux, databases, cartoons and cornflakes</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Berkholz</title>
		<link>http://wonkabar.org/archives/69#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Berkholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 05:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkabar.org/blog/2006/the-physics-of-superman/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Yeah, too bad that isn't really accurate either. Gravity doesn't disappear because an object stops rotating. In fact, people would actually weigh a bit more because of the lack of centripetal acceleration. At least he is right that it would break some rules -- spinning in the opposite direction doesn't magically turn time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, too bad that isn&#8217;t really accurate either. Gravity doesn&#8217;t disappear because an object stops rotating. In fact, people would actually weigh a bit more because of the lack of centripetal acceleration. At least he is right that it would break some rules &#8212; spinning in the opposite direction doesn&#8217;t magically turn time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
